Highlighted topics:
- Creating competence-based learning environment;
- Entrepreneurial Teacher;
- Rocket Science;
- Pitching;
- Entrepreneurial University;
- Idea Mill.
Creating competence-based
learning environment – integration of RDI (research, development, innovation)
and learning.
A competence-based
learning environment is built through the integration of knowing, doing and being.
The social-cultural knowledge was presented to us as part of the “being” constitution.
Therefore, UNESCO’s four-pillars of Learning must be
integrated in the curriculum.
Concepts of
entrepreneurship, innovation, change and services for business
were extensively discussed in pairs, and then in whole group.
As an
educator, it was interesting to analyze the strategies used by the lecturers. Their
starting point to discuss those topics was by applying a strategy to survey our
prior-knowledge.
All concepts raised were valued and somehow weaved.
Rocket Science
Though the use of
a group work, we had to create a service/product to beat our “supposedly
strongest competitor”: Virgin Galactic http://www.virgingalactic.com/.
There were
4 members in our group: Regina, Emily, Torsten and me.
We created what we named “GEM”
– Galatic Experience Module. I had to be the team leader, since the lecturer
demanded a Brazilian had to. As a team
leader, I thought that the first thing I should do was to survey my team’s
interest to build a rocket and if it would have any relation to their “dreams”.
At first, two of them were interested and would pay a large amount of money to
have a space trip.
We then
started brainstorming about our “dream spaceship”. Very interesting ideas came
up. At that point, our ideas originated another acronym that defined our
project: SWEEP – Space Wellness and Experience Event Project. Our GEM would
sweep you off the ground and would provide you a lifetime wellness experience.
Our concept
of wellness was based in six pillars: physical, occupational, social, intellectual,
spiritual and emotional wellness. Accordingly, inside the spaceship there would
be a room for each area, and all of them would intersect. In the entry, our
user would be “scanned”. His personality, likes, dislikes and unconscious
wellness desires would be reveled and a customized experience would be
programed.
Our project
was based on the Quantum Physics. All wellness experience could be carried out,
but not all of them could be seen by everyone, only the individual could see
and experience. Most of the events could be virtual inside the spaceship, and
some would really happen.
Our marketing
man, Torsten presented our spaceship. After the construction and presentation,
we assessed our process of conceiving the idea. The good points raised were mainly about the teamwork
itself: process of creation and construction. Everybody enjoyed the process. The
not-so-good points raised were: communication obstacles and the fact that not
even one member could get really involved in all steps: 1. Brainstorming, 2.
Making it real (constructing), 4. Presenting to the audience. Of course I played
a very important role as a team leader,
so I myself took those not-so-good points into my account.
Pitching Experience
I enjoyed
learning about the “Pitching event”. It consists of a brief oral presentation of an idea, in that case it was specifically about an entrepreneur idea.
Although some ideas presented sounded a little naïve,
some were really interesting and I guess the main purpose of that kind of event is to encourage students to innovate. Furthermore, the expertises' feedback were truly valuable and will certainly teach a lot to those participants.
Lecture: The Entrepreneurial University –
Paul Coyle
The lecture
presented by Paul Coyle was really interesting. While he was lecturing, I was
trying to identify through the probable solutions presented their challenges.
I
guess most of them are somehow similar.
How can leadership move their institutions
to a more entrepreneurial mode?
Actions must be, again, integrated.
Idea Mill
The Idea
Mill was presented as a project in which teams would have to come up with at
least 90 ideas. At first, that sounded as something really hard, but the
strategies to develop those ideas were then presented.
The following
guidance was given:
1. We had to answer some
questions related to: our main services, our users’ needs, what I can do to
help users, partnerships I could establish to improve/expand my institution’s
services.
2. After that, we were
expected to create questions related to our previous answers.
3. The group had to
discuss the questions and select one single question.
4. Then, answer the questions
- creating ideas/solutions regarding four areas: institution, staff, students
and user.
5. Each member of the group had to write at least 4 ideas (solutions) for
each area and pass each sheet (of 4) clockwise on to the next member (As in our
group there were 5 members, we had to come up with at least 80 ideas!)
6. Come up with the
ideas.
7. Select the best
ideas.
8. Select again in
groups. Discuss and come up with one single idea to the question.
9. Through the use of
NABC model, we had to create a service/product .
10. Present the
service/product created to the audience.
11. Audience had to ask
questions/give feedback (unfortunately, we did not have enough time for that).
Our
question:
- How can we offer services that can increase human capital for social innovation?
Our
answer:
- Developing practical social projects and Professional Development Projects which aim to establish a cooperative, creative, problem-solving and innovative environment regarding social issues.
Our Idea:
- Project Factory
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário